Development of High-Efficiency Casting Process for Steel Casting Pump Casings Using Dual-Phase Steel

Steel casting components, particularly pump casings, face significant challenges in balancing quality and manufacturing costs. This study focuses on optimizing the casting process for single-suction pump casings made of dual-phase steel, aiming to improve yield rates while maintaining defect-free production. Traditional methods for steel casting pump casings exhibit low process yields (<50%), primarily due to shrinkage and inclusion defects, which increase material waste and reduce competitiveness.

Defect Analysis in Steel Casting

Defects in steel casting pump casings are categorized into two types:

Defect Type Cause Critical Locations
Shrinkage Insufficient feeding during solidification Seal ring, inlet flange, connection flange
Inclusions Slag entrapment or refractory erosion Flow passage regions

For dual-phase steel casting, the following material characteristics demand specific process considerations:

$$
\begin{cases}
\text{High melting point} \\
\text{Low fluidity} \\
\text{High shrinkage (2.0–2.5\%)} \\
\text{Oxidation sensitivity}
\end{cases}
$$

Gating System Design for Steel Casting Optimization

A bottom-gated open system was designed to address turbulence and temperature gradients. Key parameters include:

  1. Pouring temperature: 1,580°C
  2. Pouring time:
    $$
    t = \sqrt[2]{W} + \sqrt[3]{W} \approx 27.4 \, \text{s} \quad (W = 400 \, \text{kg})
    $$
  3. Gating ratio:
    $$
    A_{\text{choke}} : A_{\text{runner}} : A_{\text{ingate}} = 1 : 1.1 : 1.2
    $$
Parameter Original Process Optimized Process
Yield Rate 47% 68%
Risers per Casting 5 3
Material Cost Reduction 44%

Simulation-Driven Process Validation

MAGMA simulations compared two orientations for steel casting solidification:

  1. Connection flange upward: Required extensive risers to feed shrinkage-prone zones.
  2. Connection flange downward: Concentrated defects at critical junctions, enabling localized feeding solutions.

The final design incorporated chromite sand inserts to balance modulus:
$$
M_{\text{critical}} = \frac{V}{A} \approx 0.8 \, \text{cm}
$$
where \( V \) is volume and \( A \) is cooling surface area.

Production Results in Steel Casting

Post-optimization trials demonstrated:

  • Zero leakage failures in 1.5 MPa pressure tests
  • 62% reduction in grinding labor
  • 3-hour reduction in machining time per unit

This steel casting process innovation highlights the effectiveness of simulation-guided design in resolving contradictory requirements between feeding efficiency and defect prevention. The methodology provides a replicable framework for complex steel casting components requiring high structural integrity and cost efficiency.

Scroll to Top