Optimization of Precision Investment Casting Gating System Design for Support Components Using ProCAST Simulation

Precision investment casting is widely recognized for its ability to produce complex geometries with high dimensional accuracy and superior surface finish. However, traditional process development relies heavily on iterative trial-and-error experiments, leading to prolonged cycles and elevated costs. This study explores the application of numerical simulation to optimize the gating system design for a nickel-based superalloy (K444) support component, thereby eliminating defects and improving casting quality.

Precision Investment Casting Process

Process Challenges and Initial Trial

The support component features thin-walled structures (4.5 mm thickness) with dimensions of 186 mm × 308 mm × 318 mm. Initial trials using a simplified gating system revealed severe shrinkage porosity in the upper-middle regions of the sidewalls, as identified through X-ray and fluorescent inspections. The defects were attributed to premature solidification of feeding channels, which created isolated liquid zones (ILZs) incapable of receiving adequate metallostatic pressure.

Gating System Optimization Strategies

Three gating system designs were proposed to address these challenges:

Design Features Insulation Configuration
“Loop” System 9 gates per side, 6 mm insulation on gates 12 mm insulation on sprue
“Herringbone” System 4 gates per side, enlarged gate cross-sections 12 mm insulation on all runners
“Linear” System 5 staggered gates, optimized thermal gradient 12 mm insulation with cross-flow control

Numerical Simulation and Defect Prediction

ProCAST simulations evaluated solidification behavior using key parameters:

$$ \text{Fraction Solid (FS)} = \frac{T_{liquidus} – T}{T_{liquidus} – T_{solidus}} $$

where $T$ represents real-time temperature at each node. The Niyama criterion predicted shrinkage porosity:

$$ NY = \frac{G}{\sqrt{\dot{T}}} $$

where $G$ denotes thermal gradient (°C/mm) and $\dot{T}$ is cooling rate (°C/s). Threshold values were set at $NY \leq 1.0$ for critical shrinkage risk.

Simulation Results Comparison
Metric Loop System Herringbone Linear
Max FS in Gates (%) 66.7 40.0 53.3
Solidification Time (s) 800 620 710
Defect Volume (%) 5.2 0.8 3.1

Thermal Gradient Analysis

The herringbone system demonstrated optimal thermal management, achieving sequential solidification from base to top. The temperature gradient distribution followed:

$$ \nabla T = \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = 8.7\,\text{°C/cm} $$

This gradient ensured continuous liquid metal feeding until complete solidification, as verified by the absence of ILZs in simulation results.

Industrial Validation

Production trials using the herringbone design confirmed simulation predictions. X-ray inspection showed no detectable shrinkage defects, with dimensional accuracy meeting CT6 tolerance standards. The success highlights the effectiveness of precision investment casting simulation in reducing development cycles by 68% compared to conventional methods.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that numerical simulation enables systematic optimization of precision investment casting processes. By analyzing fraction solid progression and thermal gradients, engineers can design gating systems that prevent defect formation while maintaining production efficiency. The methodology proves particularly valuable for thin-walled superalloy components requiring strict quality control.

Scroll to Top