Research on Casting Process of HT300 High Strength and Low Stress Machine Tool Castings

In the machine tool industry, cast iron remains a dominant structural material, accounting for approximately 70% of the total weight of machine tool products. Modern machine tools are evolving towards higher load capacity, efficiency, and precision, demanding cast iron materials with superior strength, stiffness, and dimensional stability. However, machine tool castings often exhibit significant challenges due to large variations in wall thickness, uneven hardness, high section sensitivity, and substantial internal stresses. These factors lead to deformation after machining and poor dimensional stability, necessitating one or multiple artificial aging treatments to mitigate distortions. This increases production costs and reduces efficiency. HT300 is a primary material for machine tool beds, and optimizing its composition to enhance strength and reduce residual stresses is crucial for producing high-performance machine tool castings.

This study investigates the casting process for HT300 high-strength, low-stress machine tool castings. We examine the effects of chemical composition, particularly the silicon-to-carbon ratio (Si/C) and alloying elements, on mechanical properties, metallurgical structure, section sensitivity, residual stress, and chilling tendency. Through systematic experimentation and production validation, we aim to identify optimal parameters for achieving stable, high-quality machine tool castings.

Experimental Materials and Methods

The experimental materials included gray cast iron test bars, stress frames, and triangular test blocks with varying compositions. The chemical composition range was selected as follows: ω(C) 2.85%–3.25%, ω(Si) 1.50%–2.60%, ω(Mn) 0.80%–1.00%, ω(P) 0.040%–0.070%, ω(S) ≤ 0.100%, with some groups alloyed with chromium (Cr). Test bars with diameters of ϕ30 mm, ϕ50 mm, ϕ90 mm, and ϕ120 mm were produced. A total of 18 different chemical compositions were prepared, each used to cast the four sizes of test bars and stress frames. Additionally, triangular test blocks were cast for specific groups to assess white iron formation.

Melting was conducted using a 6,000 kg medium-frequency induction furnace. The chemical compositions of all groups met the experimental requirements, as summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Chemical Compositions of Gray Cast Iron for Experiment (mass fraction, %)
Group No. C Si Mn P S Cr
1 2.90 1.60 0.95 0.042 0.092
2 2.88 1.98 0.91 0.055 0.084
3 2.92 2.10 0.92 0.054 0.100 0.35
4 2.92 2.20 1.00 0.050 0.100
5 2.95 2.12 0.80 0.054 0.082
6 2.94 2.61 0.87 0.043 0.092
7 3.02 1.61 0.80 0.043 0.064
8 2.98 2.03 0.96 0.052 0.100
9 2.98 2.03 0.99 0.050 0.098 0.3
10 2.98 2.35 0.88 0.059 0.100
11 3.20 1.55 0.98 0.049 0.098
12 3.20 1.55 0.99 0.052 0.096 0.3
13 3.15 1.60 0.96 0.056 0.086
14 3.23 1.55 0.97 0.062 0.095
15 3.15 1.59 1.00 0.060 0.096 0.3
16 3.14 2.00 0.80 0.042 0.094
17 3.22 2.16 0.85 0.048 0.074
18 3.16 2.55 0.99 0.056 0.095

All specimens were molded using resin sand, with each group’s samples poured from the same ladle of molten iron. Inoculation was performed using SiFe75 inoculant at 0.6%–0.7% by weight, added via the pouring stream method. The tapping temperature exceeded 1430°C, and the pouring temperature ranged from 1350°C to 1380°C.

Experimental Plan and Specimen Dimensions

The experimental plan focused on evaluating the impact of Si/C ratio and alloying on material properties and microstructure. Key aspects included:

  • Casting 18 composition groups into four sizes of test bars and stress frames.
  • Testing tensile strength and hardness for each size of test bar.
  • Examining metallographic structure of ϕ30 mm test bars.
  • Measuring residual stress via stress frame deformation before and after cutting.
  • Assessing white iron tendency using triangular test blocks for selected groups.

The tensile test specimens were machined according to standardized dimensions, as illustrated in Figure 1. A WEW-300D hydraulic universal testing machine was used for tensile tests, and a HB-3000 Brinell hardness tester measured hardness. Metallographic analysis was conducted using a J-E68S optical microscope.

Stress frames, with dimensions shown in Figure 3, were used to measure residual stress. Points A and B were marked, and the distance L1 was measured before cutting. After cutting, the distance L2 was measured, and the elongation percentage was calculated as (L2 – L1)/L1 × 100%. A lower elongation indicates lower residual stress.

Triangular test blocks, with dimensions in Figure 4, were employed to evaluate white iron formation. The width of the white iron zone was measured after solidification.

Results and Analysis

Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the 18 composition groups were tested for the four sizes of test bars. Brinell hardness and tensile strength decreased with increasing specimen diameter. The differences between the smallest and largest diameters (ΔHBW and ΔRm) indicate section sensitivity. Key results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Mechanical Properties of Gray Cast Iron Samples
Group No. CE (%) Si/C Cr (%) Brinell Hardness (HBW) ΔHBW Tensile Strength (MPa) ΔRm
ϕ30 ϕ50 ϕ90 ϕ120 ϕ30 ϕ50 ϕ90 ϕ120
1 3.43 0.55 233 217 192 181 52 348 328 285 245 103
2 3.54 0.69 237 219 201 190 47 365 345 319 268 97
3 3.62 0.72 0.35 235 230 225 220 15 352 342 304 285 67
4 3.65 0.75 238 218 201 193 45 355 325 298 262 93
5 3.66 0.72 219 206 191 180 39 315 282 245 221 94
6 3.81 0.89 227 212 195 179 48 320 289 262 235 85
7 3.56 0.53 217 208 185 158 59 300 275 238 198 102
8 3.66 0.68 225 210 195 179 46 330 305 275 235 95
9 3.66 0.68 0.3 241 235 219 208 33 352 328 302 281 71
10 3.76 0.79 227 210 196 180 47 300 271 252 212 88
11 3.72 0.48 211 199 175 155 56 275 245 198 158 117
12 3.72 0.48 0.3 223 209 198 181 42 310 285 250 225 85
13 3.68 0.51 215 205 178 161 54 281 260 208 165 116
14 3.75 0.48 218 210 180 165 53 283 261 203 162 121
15 3.68 0.50 0.3 233 225 205 192 41 341 323 291 260 81
16 3.81 0.64 207 192 165 156 52 275 248 192 168 107
17 3.94 0.67 201 189 162 152 49 250 225 185 155 95
18 4.01 0.81 195 178 160 148 47 235 205 188 155 80

Groups 1–10, 12, and 15 achieved tensile strengths ≥300 MPa for ϕ30 mm test bars. Without Cr addition, achieving this required a carbon equivalent (CE) between 3.43% and 3.76% and Si/C between 0.55 and 0.89. The relationship between CE and mechanical properties is illustrated in Figure 5, showing that tensile strength and hardness decrease with increasing CE, regardless of Si/C. However, at constant CE, higher Si/C ratios (0.60–0.75) improve strength and hardness. For instance, at CE=3.60%–3.75%, Si/C=0.60–0.75 yields stable strength meeting HT300 requirements.

The carbon equivalent is calculated as:

$$ CE = \%C + \frac{1}{3}\%Si $$

And the Si/C ratio is:

$$ \text{Si/C} = \frac{\%Si}{\%C} $$

Alloying with Cr enhances strength and hardness by stabilizing pearlite and refining graphite. For example, Groups 8 and 9 have similar CE and Si/C but differ in Cr content; Group 9 with Cr shows higher strength (352 MPa vs. 330 MPa) and hardness (241 HBW vs. 225 HBW). Metallographic analysis revealed finer graphite and pearlite in Cr-alloyed samples, contributing to improved properties.

Section Sensitivity

Section sensitivity, critical for machine tool castings with varying wall thicknesses, was evaluated by comparing mechanical properties across different diameters. Lower differences in hardness (ΔHBW) and tensile strength (ΔRm) between ϕ30 mm and ϕ120 mm indicate reduced sensitivity. Groups with Si/C between 0.67 and 0.81, such as Groups 2–6, 8–10, 12, 15, 17, and 18, exhibited ΔHBW < 50 HBW and ΔRm < 100 MPa, demonstrating low section sensitivity. Higher Si/C ratios promote uniform microstructure by enhancing graphite formation and solid solution strengthening, reducing property variations across sections.

Residual Stress

Residual stress was measured using stress frames. The elongation percentage after cutting indicates stress levels; lower values correspond to reduced residual stress. Results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Stress Frame Composition and Residual Deformation
Group No. C (%) Si (%) Cr (%) CE (%) Si/C Tensile Strength (MPa) Brinell Hardness (HBW) L2 (mm) L1 (mm) L2-L1 (mm) Elongation Percentage (%)
1 2.90 1.60 3.43 0.55 348 233 89.98 88.30 1.68 1.90
2 2.88 1.98 3.54 0.69 365 237 90.03 88.74 1.29 1.45
3 2.91 2.10 0.35 3.63 0.72 352 235 89.31 88.02 1.29 1.47
4 2.92 2.20 3.65 0.75 355 238 89.04 87.84 1.20 1.37
5 2.95 2.12 3.66 0.72 315 219 89.38 88.10 1.28 1.45
6 2.94 2.61 3.81 0.89 320 227 89.11 87.92 1.19 1.36
7 3.02 1.61 3.56 0.53 300 217 89.82 88.08 1.74 1.98
8 2.98 2.03 3.66 0.68 330 225 90.14 88.90 1.24 1.39
9 2.98 2.03 0.3 3.67 0.68 352 241 89.14 87.88 1.26 1.43
10 2.98 2.35 3.76 0.79 300 227 89.21 87.96 1.25 1.42
11 3.20 1.55 3.72 0.48 275 211 89.72 87.92 1.80 2.05
12 3.20 1.55 0.3 3.73 0.48 310 223 89.75 87.91 1.84 2.09
13 3.15 1.60 3.68 0.51 281 215 89.56 87.84 1.72 1.96
14 3.23 1.55 3.75 0.48 283 218 90.11 88.25 1.86 2.11
15 3.15 1.59 0.3 3.69 0.50 341 233 89.96 88.12 1.84 2.09
16 3.14 2.00 3.81 0.64 275 207 89.58 88.16 1.42 1.61
17 3.22 2.16 3.94 0.67 250 201 89.43 87.98 1.45 1.65
18 3.16 2.55 4.01 0.81 235 195 89.42 88.04 1.38 1.57

Groups with Si/C ≤ 0.55 (e.g., Groups 1, 7, 11–15) showed elongation percentages ≥1.9%, indicating higher residual stress. In contrast, groups with Si/C ≥ 0.60 (e.g., Groups 2–6, 8–10, 16–18) had elongation percentages ≤1.7%, demonstrating lower stress. Thus, higher Si/C ratios effectively reduce residual stress in machine tool castings.

White Iron Tendency

The chilling tendency was assessed using triangular test blocks for Groups 5, 7, 8, and 12, representing varying Si/C ratios. White iron widths before and after inoculation are listed in Table 4.

Table 4: White Iron Values of Triangular Test Blocks with Different Compositions
Group No. CE (%) Si/C Tensile Strength (MPa) White Iron Width (mm) – Base Iron White Iron Width (mm) – Inoculated
5 3.66 0.72 315 10 3
7 3.56 0.53 300 25 15
8 3.66 0.68 330 12 8
12 3.72 0.48 310 30 10

Groups with Si/C < 0.60 (Groups 7 and 12) exhibited larger white iron zones, with inoculated widths ≥10 mm. Groups with Si/C > 0.60 (Groups 5 and 8) had smaller zones (<10 mm after inoculation), confirming that higher Si/C ratios reduce chilling tendency, beneficial for producing sound machine tool castings.

Production Validation

To validate the findings, we produced machine tool bed castings (specifically, grinding machine beds) with HT300 material. The castings weighed 10,700 kg, with dimensions of 8,500 mm × 1,035 mm × 550 mm. The bed guide rails were 8,000 mm long and 130 mm thick, while other sections were 35–40 mm thick. Two castings, V501091 and V501092, were manufactured with different compositions, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Chemical Composition of Castings
Casting ID C (%) Si (%) Mn (%) P (%) S (%) Cr (%) CE (%) Si/C
V501091 3.02 1.68 0.92 0.042 0.076 3.58 0.56
V501092 2.96 2.03 0.98 0.046 0.082 0.3 3.64 0.68

Melting was performed in a 6,000 kg medium-frequency induction furnace. Pouring temperature was 1370°C ± 10°C, with 0.6% SiFe75 inoculant added during tapping. The mold breakdown time exceeded 192 hours. For V501092, artificial aging was omitted before rough machining to assess natural stress relief; only after rough machining was aging conducted at 520°C ± 10°C for 6 hours, followed by finish machining.

Testing results for the castings:

  • V501091: Tensile strength 309 MPa, hardness 219 HBW, microstructure with A-type graphite (length grade 4), >98% fine pearlite, and minor ferrite. Deformation along the length was ≤6 mm; guide rail hardness ranged from 180 to 196 HBW.
  • V501092: Tensile strength 348 MPa, hardness 241 HBW, similar microstructure but with finer pearlite due to Cr addition. Deformation was ≤6 mm; guide rail hardness was 201–210 HBW, showing better uniformity.

Deformation tracking over time (Table 6) revealed that V501092 (low-stress composition) maintained stable dimensions with only 0.012 mm concavity after six months, whereas V501091 (conventional composition) exhibited increasing concavity up to 0.079 mm. This demonstrates that the optimized composition reduces long-term deformation, enhancing stability for machine tool castings.

Table 6: Deformation Measurement of Machine Tool Bed Guide Rails
Casting ID 1 Hour 24 Hours 30 Days 3 Months 6 Months Remarks
V501091 Concave 0.011 mm Concave 0.013 mm Concave 0.025 mm Concave 0.048 mm Concave 0.079 mm Conventional Cast Iron
V501092 Concave 0.010 mm Concave 0.011 mm Concave 0.012 mm Concave 0.012 mm Concave 0.012 mm Low-Stress Cast Iron

Conclusion

This study systematically investigated the casting process for HT300 high-strength, low-stress machine tool castings. Key findings include:

  • Mechanical properties, including tensile strength and hardness, decrease with increasing carbon equivalent (CE). To consistently achieve HT300 grade, CE should be controlled within a specific range.
  • At constant CE, higher Si/C ratios (above 0.60) improve strength, reduce residual stress, and minimize section sensitivity. The optimal range for Si/C is 0.60–0.75.
  • Alloying with chromium enhances pearlite stability and refines microstructure, further boosting strength and hardness.
  • For HT300 machine tool castings requiring tensile strength over 300 MPa and hardness of 190–220 HBW, the recommended composition is CE = 3.60%–3.75% and Si/C = 0.60–0.75, with optional Cr addition for thick sections.

Production validation confirmed that this optimized composition yields machine tool castings with excellent mechanical properties, uniform hardness, minimal deformation, and high dimensional stability. By reducing residual stresses, the need for pre-machining artificial aging is eliminated, lowering costs and improving efficiency in manufacturing high-performance machine tool castings.

Scroll to Top