Analysis and Improvement of Blowhole Defects in Motor Housing Castings

Blowhole defects constitute one of the most persistent and costly challenges in aluminum gravity casting processes. In our production of motor housing rough castings, these defects accounted for over 40% of total production failures, severely compromising product reliability, structural integrity, and aesthetic quality. This unacceptably high rejection rate directly contradicted our strategic goals of reducing manufacturing costs and improving operational efficiency. Consequently, we initiated a comprehensive project targeting the root causes and implementing effective countermeasures for blowhole defect reduction. The motor housing, a critical structural component for electric vehicle motors, features a cylindrical design with an outer diameter of Ø250mm, an inner cavity of Ø218mm, and a height of 186mm. Cast from ZL101A aluminum alloy at a pouring temperature of 730°C, with a final rough casting weight of approximately 18kg, the process utilizes sand cores – primarily two complex spiral structures made from shell sand material – within a gravity casting process employing reverse pouring.


Blowhole defects concentrated on the upper plane of the casting requiring machining to become fully visible

The primary manifestation of the blowhole defect occurred consistently on the upper plane of the casting (corresponding to the cope mold half). These defects were typically subsurface, becoming fully visible only after machining operations. They presented as smooth-walled cavities, often elliptical or irregularly shaped, indicating entrapped gas rather than shrinkage. Initial analysis categorized potential root causes using a structured approach across five key areas: Man, Material, Method, Machine (Casting Conditions), and Mold.

Root Cause Investigation:
Eliminating human factors as a primary root cause was relatively straightforward. The process utilized robotic pouring, minimizing variability in metal transfer. Operators followed standardized work instructions for core placement and machine parameter verification, with process audits confirming consistent adherence. Similarly, analysis of the molten metal source showed that hydrogen content ($[H]$) and inclusion levels fell within acceptable specifications, governed by the relationship:

$$ [H]_{measured} \leq [H]_{spec} $$

Frequent degassing and careful flux management maintained melt quality. However, the investigation pinpointed two dominant factors contributing significantly to the blowhole defect prevalence:

  1. Sand Core Gas Evolution: The shell sand cores, essential for forming the internal cavities, were identified as major gas generators. The organic resin binders in the sand decompose under the intense heat of the molten aluminum (T > 400°C), releasing substantial volumes of gas. The total gas volume ($V_g$) evolved depends on the binder content ($b$), core density ($\rho_c$), and temperature ($T$), approximated by:

$$ V_g = k \cdot b \cdot \rho_c \cdot f(T) $$

where $k$ is a constant and $f(T)$ is a temperature-dependent function. A high gas evolution rate ($dV_g/dt$) creates significant back pressure at the metal-core interface, increasing the risk of gas entrapment and subsequent blowhole defect formation if venting is inadequate. Core permeability ($\kappa$), influenced by grain size distribution and packing density, also plays a critical role in allowing evolved gases to escape:

$$ \kappa \propto \frac{d^2}{\mu} $$

where $d$ is the effective grain size and $\mu$ is the gas viscosity.

  1. Mold Filling Dynamics & Venting Inefficiency: Simulation analysis using AnyCasting software revealed critical flaws in the filling pattern and venting capability of the original mold design. The semi-gated system, with ingates positioned at the gear face location, caused molten metal to enter the cavity primarily at the bottom and flow upwards along two paths. This resulted in turbulent flow ($Re > 4000$), characterized by the Reynolds number:

$$ Re = \frac{\rho v D_h}{\mu} $$

where $\rho$ is density, $v$ is velocity, $D_h$ is hydraulic diameter, and $\mu$ is dynamic viscosity. Turbulence promotes air entrainment and hinders the floatation of dissolved hydrogen. Crucially, the original design lacked sufficient venting capacity, particularly in the upper mold regions where gases naturally accumulated. The trapped gases, primarily from core decomposition and entrained air, could not escape efficiently, leading to the characteristic blowhole defects observed on the upper casting plane.

Implemented Countermeasures:
Our improvement strategy directly addressed the two primary root causes:

  1. Optimization of Sand Core Properties: Collaborating closely with the core sand supplier, we developed and qualified a new shell sand material formulation (designated J4K) to replace the original material (R4A1). The focus was on reducing gas evolution volume and rate while maintaining adequate strength and collapsibility. Key parameter changes are summarized below:
Shell Sand Core Material Properties: Before and After Improvement
Property Original Material (R4A1) Improved Material (J4K) Impact on Blowhole Defect
Material Designation R4A1 J4K
Grain Size (AFS) 40-60 42-50 Slightly larger average grain size improves permeability ($\kappa \uparrow$)
Gas Evolution (mL/g) ≤ 13 ≤ 10 Significantly reduces total gas volume ($V_g \downarrow$) and peak pressure
Binder Type/Content Proprietary (Higher) Proprietary (Optimized Lower) Reduces gas source term ($b \downarrow$)

This material change alone resulted in a noticeable decrease in blowhole defects, but the rate remained above the target threshold.

  1. Mold Modification for Enhanced Venting: To tackle the fundamental issue of gas entrapment in the upper mold regions identified by simulation and defect mapping, we redesigned the mold cope. The critical modification involved adding dedicated venting risers (feeders) strategically positioned on the cope at the highest points of the cavity, directly above the zones most prone to the blowhole defect. These risers serve two key functions:
    • Provide a low-resistance escape path for gases evolved from the core and displaced air during filling.
    • Maintain a thermal gradient that promotes directional solidification towards the riser, further aiding gas floatation and expulsion. The effectiveness of a riser for venting can be related to its cross-sectional area ($A_r$) and height ($H_r$), influencing the pressure drop ($\Delta P$):

$$ \Delta P \propto \frac{\dot{m}^2 H_r}{A_r^2 \rho_g} $$

where $\dot{m}$ is the gas mass flow rate and $\rho_g$ is the gas density. Larger $A_r$ minimizes $\Delta P$, facilitating gas flow out of the mold cavity.


Location of added venting risers on the cope mold section to alleviate trapped gas causing blowhole defects

Results and Validation:
The implementation of the improved J4K sand cores combined with the redesigned mold featuring strategically placed venting risers yielded significant and quantifiable improvements. Production batch tracking and statistical process control data revealed a dramatic reduction in the blowhole defect rate. The rejection rate due to blowhole defects plummeted from the initial level exceeding 40% to consistently below 8%.

Blowhole Defect Rejection Rate: Improvement Summary
Condition Blowhole Defect Rejection Rate (%) Improvement
Baseline (Original Core & Mold) > 40%
After J4K Core Implementation Only ~ 15-20% Significant Reduction
After J4K Core + Mold Venting Risers < 8% Target Achieved

X-ray inspection confirmed a substantial decrease in internal porosity in the critical upper regions of the castings. Dimensional analysis and mechanical testing of the castings produced with the modified process confirmed that the improvements did not adversely affect other critical quality parameters.

Conclusion:
Blowhole defects in aluminum gravity castings, particularly complex components like motor housings requiring sand cores, are often multifactorial. Our systematic investigation demonstrated that the primary drivers were excessive gas evolution from the shell sand cores and inadequate venting capability within the mold, especially in upper sections where gases naturally accumulate. By targeting these root causes – optimizing the core sand material to reduce gas generation (J4K: lower gas evolution, optimized grain size) and redesigning the mold to incorporate effective venting risers – we achieved a substantial reduction in the blowhole defect rate, exceeding our operational targets. This case underscores the critical importance of core sand properties and mold venting design in preventing blowhole defects. Proactive utilization of casting simulation during the design phase is highly recommended to optimize gating, feeding, and venting layouts, preventing such issues before full-scale production begins. Continuous monitoring of core sand properties and melt quality remains essential for sustaining these quality improvements and minimizing the occurrence of blowhole defects long-term.

Scroll to Top