Development of Casting Process for Ductile Iron Differential Housing

This paper presents the casting process optimization for a split-type 9AT differential housing made of QT600-M ductile iron. The component weighs 3.32 kg as-cast with challenging geometric features including four windows, three asymmetric bosses, and strict dimensional tolerances (maximum mismatch ≤ 0.5 mm). The production utilized DISA molding line technology to achieve high precision and repeatability.

Material Requirements and Challenges

The chemical composition and mechanical properties requirements are shown in Tables 1-3. Critical quality targets included:

  • Internal porosity ≤ 3% defect area ratio (D3/1 criteria)
  • X-ray inspection ≤ ASTM E446 Level 2
  • CT scan compliance for critical sections
Table 1: Chemical Composition Requirements (wt.%)
C Si Mn Cu Mg S P Sn Ti
3.3-3.9 1.8-3.0 0.2-1.0 0.2-1.0 0.027-0.06 ≤0.02 ≤0.06 ≤0.06 ≤0.06
Table 2: Mechanical Properties
Tensile Strength (MPa) Yield Strength (MPa) Elongation (%) Hardness (HBW)
≥650 ≥405 ≥3 200-265

Initial Process Design

The original gating system employed three risers for two castings with stepped runner connections. The riser design followed modulus calculations:

$$
M_{riser} = \frac{V}{A} = \frac{120 \times 43 \times 50}{2(120 \times 43 + 120 \times 50 + 43 \times 50)} = 6\ \text{mm}
$$

where $M_{riser}$ is riser modulus, $V$ is volume, and $A$ is cooling surface area. Simulation revealed shrinkage defects up to 11 mm³ in pin holes (Figure 4), necessitating process modifications.

Process Optimization

Key improvements addressed casting defects and production efficiency:

  1. Orientation Adjustment: Rotated casting 90° to optimize riser feeding positions
  2. Gating System Redesign: Implemented top-feeding runners with splash guards
  3. Venting Enhancement: Added 6 mm venting slots in horizontal runners
  4. Process Yield Improvement: Reduced runner weight by 18% through sectional optimization

The modified feeding system reduced pouring time from 16s to 10.3s, calculated as:

$$
t = \frac{W}{\rho \cdot A \cdot \sqrt{2gH}} = \frac{6.64\ \text{kg}}{7030\ \text{kg/m³} \cdot 423\ \text{mm²} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot 9.8 \cdot 0.3}} \approx 10.2\ \text{s}
$$

where $W$ is metal weight, $\rho$ is density, $A$ is choke area, and $H$ is metallostatic head.

Defect Control Strategy

Critical measures for casting defect reduction included:

Table 3: Defect Control Matrix
Defect Type Control Method Effectiveness
Shrinkage Riser modulus optimization Defect volume ↓82%
Gas Porosity Venting system upgrade Blowholes ↓95%
Sand Inclusion Runner junction redesign Surface defects ↓70%

Production Results

The optimized process achieved:

  • Yield improvement: 36.7% → 42.7%
  • Scrap rate reduction: 3.29% (vs. initial 6.5%)
  • X-ray inspection pass rate: 100%
  • CT scan compliance: 98.7%

Final mechanical properties exceeded requirements with pearlite content ≥75% and nodularity ≥85%, satisfying:

$$
\frac{P_{actual}}{P_{required}} = \frac{650\ \text{MPa}}{405\ \text{MPa}} = 1.6 > 1.2\ \text{(safety factor)}
$$

Conclusion

The developed casting process successfully addressed critical casting defect challenges through systematic gating design optimization and process parameter adjustments. The combination of modulus-based riser design, venting system enhancement, and automated DISA line production proved effective for manufacturing high-precision differential housings with complex geometries. Continuous monitoring showed sustained defect control capability, with production scrap rates maintained below 3.5% over six months of mass production.

Scroll to Top