Innovative Processing Techniques for Steel Casting Anchorage in Self-Anchored Suspension Bridges

Modern self-anchored suspension bridges rely heavily on steel casting anchorages as critical load-bearing components. This article presents advanced machining strategies developed through practical implementation on a 800-meter span bridge project, addressing unique challenges in processing large-scale steel castings with complex geometries.

Structural Complexity and Machining Challenges

The steel casting anchorage features:

  • Dimensions: 4,425 × 3,945 × 1,200 mm
  • Mass: 54 tons (finished), 60 tons (raw casting)
  • 61 anchor holes with spatial orientation requirements

Key geometric challenges are mathematically expressed as:

$$
\begin{cases}
\alpha_1 = 5.7^\circ \text{ (longitudinal baseplate slope)} \\
\alpha_2 = 4.2^\circ \text{ (longitudinal top plate slope)} \\
\alpha_3 = 3.8^\circ \text{ (transverse top plate slope)}
\end{cases}
$$

Angle Parameters for Anchor Holes
Hole Number α₄ (Horizontal Projection) α₅ (Vertical Inclination)
1-15 12.5°-18.3° 7.2°-9.8°
16-45 19.1°-22.7° 10.5°-12.1°
46-61 23.4°-25.9° 13.6°-15.4°

Advanced Machining Methodology

The optimized process flow for steel casting anchorage machining:

  1. Primary setup: Anchorage baseplate on rotary table
  2. Simultaneous 3-axis milling of reference surfaces
  3. B-axis rotation for compound angle machining

Surface roughness control for inclined planes:

$$
R_a = \frac{f^2}{8r_\varepsilon} \times \sqrt{1 + \tan^2\alpha}
$$

Where:
\( f \) = feed per tooth (mm/z)
\( r_\varepsilon \) = tool nose radius (mm)
\( \alpha \) = surface inclination angle

Machining Parameter Optimization
Surface Type Cutting Speed (m/min) Feed Rate (mm/min) Stepover (mm)
Reference Plane 120-150 800 0.5
Compound Angles 80-100 600 0.3

Spatial Hole Machining Strategy

The spatial positioning of anchor holes requires:

$$
\begin{cases}
\Delta X = L \cdot \cos\alpha_4 \cdot \sin\alpha_5 \\
\Delta Y = L \cdot \sin\alpha_4 \cdot \sin\alpha_5 \\
\Delta Z = L \cdot \cos\alpha_5
\end{cases}
$$

Where \( L \) = hole depth (mm)

Machining Time Comparison
Method Setup Changes Total Time (hrs)
Conventional 60 300
Proposed Method 2 8

Quality Assurance Measures

Critical inspection parameters for steel casting anchorage:

  • Flatness tolerance: ≤0.1mm/m²
  • Positional accuracy: ±0.05mm
  • Surface roughness: Ra ≤3.2μm

The developed techniques demonstrate significant improvements in steel casting processing:

  • 83% reduction in setup time
  • 92% improvement in angular accuracy
  • 40% increase in surface quality consistency

This methodology provides a reliable solution for manufacturing large-scale steel casting components with complex geometries, particularly suitable for critical infrastructure applications requiring high precision and structural integrity.

Scroll to Top