Prevention of Slag Hole Defects in Ductile Iron Castings

In our production of ductile iron castings, we encountered a significant issue with slag hole defects occurring at the riser neck of a specific component. This defect manifested as surface imperfections that compromised the integrity and quality of the ductile iron castings, leading to a high rejection rate. Through detailed analysis, we identified that the root cause was related to the gating system design, which caused excessive turbulence and secondary oxidation during mold filling. This article presents our first-hand experience in diagnosing the problem, implementing corrective measures, and verifying the results, with a focus on optimizing the gating system to prevent such defects in ductile iron castings. We will use tables and formulas to summarize key data and calculations, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the process.

The slag hole defects were primarily observed near the riser neck of the ductile iron castings, as illustrated in the following image, which shows the typical appearance of such issues. These defects resulted in a scrap rate of approximately 31% during the initial production phase, highlighting the urgency for intervention. The fixed location of the defects suggested a systematic flaw in the casting process, rather than random variations. We hypothesized that the high velocity of molten iron at the inner gates led to splashing and the formation of secondary slag, which accumulated at the riser neck. This accumulation ultimately caused the slag holes, adversely affecting the surface finish and mechanical properties of the ductile iron castings.

To understand the defect mechanism, we analyzed the original gating system design. The system was configured as a closed type, with specific cross-sectional area ratios for the sprue, choke, runner, and ingates. The original gating ratio was set as ΣF_sprue : ΣF_choke : ΣF_runner : ΣF_ingate = 1 : 1.06 : 1.14 : 0.88. Here, ΣF_sprue represents the total cross-sectional area of the sprue (1,018 mm²), ΣF_choke is the choke area (1,080 mm²), ΣF_runner is the runner area (1,160 mm²), and ΣF_ingate is the total ingate area (900 mm²). The choke was positioned at the ingate, which is typical in closed systems to trap primary slag but can lead to high flow velocities. The ingate connected to the riser had a cross-sectional area of 600 mm², accounting for two-thirds of the total ingate area, making it the primary entry point for molten iron.

The high flow velocity at the ingate was a critical factor. We calculated the average linear velocity of molten iron at the ingate using the formula: $$v = \frac{Q}{A}$$ where \(v\) is the velocity, \(Q\) is the volumetric flow rate, and \(A\) is the cross-sectional area. Assuming a constant pouring rate, the velocity at the ingate was approximately 63 cm/s. This high velocity caused turbulent flow and splashing, leading to the formation of secondary oxidation slag. The secondary slag, composed of oxidized elements from the molten iron, accumulated in the riser neck due to flow dynamics and solidification patterns. The accumulation resulted in slag holes, which are detrimental to the quality of ductile iron castings. The table below summarizes the original gating system parameters and calculated velocities.

Original Gating System Parameters for Ductile Iron Castings
Component Cross-Sectional Area (mm²) Ratio Velocity (cm/s)
Sprue (ΣF_sprue) 1,018 1.00
Choke (ΣF_choke) 1,080 1.06
Runner (ΣF_runner) 1,160 1.14
Ingate Total (ΣF_ingate) 900 0.88 63
Riser Ingate (ΣF_ingate2) 600 63

The formation of secondary slag can be modeled using oxidation kinetics. The rate of slag formation due to turbulence can be expressed as: $$\frac{dS}{dt} = k \cdot v^2 \cdot A$$ where \(S\) is the amount of slag, \(t\) is time, \(k\) is a constant dependent on iron composition and temperature, \(v\) is the flow velocity, and \(A\) is the surface area exposed to air. In our case, the high velocity at the ingate significantly increased \(dS/dt\), leading to excessive slag generation. This slag then traveled with the molten iron and settled in low-flow regions like the riser neck, causing defects in the ductile iron castings. The need to reduce velocity and modify the gating system became evident to improve the quality of ductile iron castings.

We implemented two improvement schemes to address the slag hole defects. The first scheme involved relocating the choke from the ingate to the runner, just before the filter. This change aimed to better trap primary slag without affecting flow dynamics significantly. However, after producing 22 castings, the scrap rate due to slag holes was still 27%, indicating that secondary slag formation remained an issue. This confirmed that the slag holes were primarily caused by secondary oxidation due to high velocity, not primary slag inclusion. Therefore, we proceeded with the second scheme, which involved a comprehensive redesign of the gating system.

The second scheme focused on converting the gating system from closed to semi-open and adjusting the gating ratios to reduce flow velocity. The new gating ratio was set as ΣF_sprue : ΣF_choke : ΣF_runner : ΣF_ingate = 1 : 0.79 : 1.14 : 1.36. This increased the total ingate area from 900 mm² to 1,380 mm², which directly reduced the average linear velocity at the ingate to approximately 41 cm/s, as calculated using the velocity formula. Additionally, we changed the primary ingate location away from the riser. The ingate connected to the riser (ΣF_ingate2) was reduced to 540 mm², while other ingates (ΣF_ingate1) were increased to 840 mm², altering the flow distribution to minimize turbulence near the riser neck. All ingates were thinned to 3 mm to enhance slag exclusion and prevent thermal contraction issues. The table below compares the original and improved gating system parameters.

Comparison of Original and Improved Gating Systems for Ductile Iron Castings
Parameter Original System Improved System
Gating Ratio 1 : 1.06 : 1.14 : 0.88 1 : 0.79 : 1.14 : 1.36
ΣF_sprue (mm²) 1,018 1,018
ΣF_choke (mm²) 1,080 805
ΣF_runner (mm²) 1,160 1,160
ΣF_ingate Total (mm²) 900 1,380
ΣF_ingate1 (mm²) 300 840
ΣF_ingate2 (mm²) 600 540
Ingate Thickness (mm) Variable 3
Velocity at Ingate (cm/s) 63 41

The reduction in velocity was critical for minimizing turbulence and secondary slag formation. The relationship between velocity and slag formation can be further described by the Reynolds number (Re), which indicates flow regime: $$Re = \frac{\rho v D}{\mu}$$ where \(\rho\) is the density of molten iron, \(v\) is velocity, \(D\) is the hydraulic diameter, and \(\mu\) is the dynamic viscosity. A lower Re value signifies laminar flow, which reduces slag generation. In our improved system, the velocity drop from 63 cm/s to 41 cm/s resulted in a lower Re, promoting smoother flow and fewer defects in ductile iron castings. Additionally, the semi-open system allowed for better pressure distribution and reduced jetting effects, further mitigating slag issues.

After implementing the second scheme, we conducted extensive production trials. Over 4,000 ductile iron castings were produced, and none exhibited slag hole defects near the riser neck. The surfaces of the castings were smooth and met quality standards, demonstrating the effectiveness of the modifications. We monitored key performance indicators, such as scrap rate and surface quality, which showed significant improvement. The success of this approach underscores the importance of gating system design in preventing defects in ductile iron castings. The following table summarizes the production results before and after the improvements.

Production Results for Ductile Iron Castings Before and After Improvements
Aspect Before Improvements After Improvements
Number of Castings Produced Initial batch 4,000+
Slag Hole Defect Rate 31% 0%
Surface Quality Defective Smooth
Primary Improvement None Gating system optimization

In conclusion, our experience highlights that slag hole defects in ductile iron castings, particularly at the riser neck, are primarily caused by high flow velocities in the gating system, leading to secondary oxidation slag. By optimizing the gating system to a semi-open design, adjusting the gating ratios, and relocating the primary ingate, we successfully reduced the velocity from 63 cm/s to 41 cm/s and eliminated the defects. This approach not only improved the quality of ductile iron castings but also enhanced production efficiency. We recommend avoiding choke positions at the ingate in ductile iron castings to minimize turbulence and secondary slag formation. Future work could explore computational fluid dynamics simulations to further refine gating designs for ductile iron castings, ensuring consistent high quality in industrial applications.

The principles applied here can be generalized to other casting processes involving ductile iron. For instance, the velocity formula and gating ratio calculations are essential tools for designing efficient systems. The key takeaway is that controlling flow dynamics is crucial for defect prevention in ductile iron castings. We hope this detailed account provides valuable insights for practitioners working with ductile iron castings, enabling them to achieve better results in their casting operations. Through continuous improvement and attention to gating design, the production of high-quality ductile iron castings can be consistently maintained.

Scroll to Top