In the competitive landscape of heavy-duty engine manufacturing, the relentless pursuit of power density, efficiency, and reliability is paramount. Our strategic focus has long been on the A-series engine, a cornerstone of product development. After years of dedicated R&D and process refinement, its overall quality has reached a stable plateau. However, persistent challenges demand continuous improvement. Among these, the issue of coolant leakage from the engine block stands out as a critical quality bottleneck requiring focused攻关. This article details our comprehensive investigation and systematic improvements targeting water leakage defects in the A-series engine block, a component cast from high-strength gray cast iron. The financial and operational impetus for this project was significant: leakage defects are only identified after the block has undergone extensive machining, air-pressure testing, and hydrostatic pressure testing. By this late stage, substantial costs from casting, handling, machining, and partial assembly have already been incurred, leading to considerable scrap losses. An analysis of our 2022 quality data revealed that scrap attributed to leakage constituted a staggering 45% of the total scrap cost for the A-engine line, underscoring the urgent need for a solution to drive cost reduction and enhance operational efficiency.
The production of the A-engine block involves casting a thin-walled, high-strength gray iron component with approximate dimensions of 940 mm × 392 mm × 427 mm. The water jacket core is produced using Mingzhi hot-box core shooting machines, while other sand cores are made via the cold-box process. Molding is performed on a German KW line, employing a stepped gating system designed to ensure smooth and controlled mold filling.
A statistical review of all leakage-related failures from 2022 revealed an unacceptably high leakage rate of 3.3%. The distribution of leakage points is summarized in Table 1. The tappet bore and the ø6 mm and ø20 mm oil galleries were identified as the primary failure locations. Subsequent failure analysis, involving multiple sectionings and scanning electron microscope (SEM) examinations, categorized the defects: leakage from the ø6 mm and ø20 mm oil galleries was attributed to nitrogen gas porosity, while leakage from the tappet bore area was linked to poor fusion of internal chills (core supports) and chill sleeves.
| Leakage Location | Percentage of Total Leakage (%) |
|---|---|
| Tappet Bore | 38 |
| ø6 mm Oil Gallery | 32 |
| ø20 mm Oil Gallery | 18 |
| Other Locations | 12 |
The root cause analysis and subsequent countermeasures were tackled location by location, focusing on the distinct failure modes inherent in the complex geometry of the gray cast iron block.
Leakage at the ø6 mm Oil Gallery: Combating Nitrogen Porosity
The ø6 mm oil gallery is drilled into a solid cylindrical section approximately 20 mm in diameter. This cylindrical mass is formed by the water jacket core and the tappet core. This region possesses a greater wall thickness compared to the adjacent water jacket walls, creating a localized hot spot that solidifies more slowly. Such areas are predisposed to shrinkage porosity and gas defects. Metallurgical analysis confirmed the presence of interconnected nitrogen blowholes between the drilled oil gallery surface and the water jacket cavity. The formation of nitrogen porosity in gray cast iron is governed by the solubility limit of nitrogen in the molten iron, which decreases sharply during solidification. The relationship can be conceptually described by Sieverts’ Law for gas dissolution, though the system is complex:
$$ [N] \propto K \sqrt{P_{N_2}} $$
where $[N]$ is the dissolved nitrogen content, $K$ is an equilibrium constant dependent on temperature and composition, and $P_{N_2}$ is the partial pressure of nitrogen at the metal-gas interface. During solidification, the solubility drops, leading to supersaturation. If the local nitrogen content $[N]_{local}$ exceeds the solubility limit $[N]_{sol}$ at that temperature, nitrogen gas precipitates, forming pores: $[N]_{local} > [N]_{sol}(T) \rightarrow N_{2(gas)}$.
Long-term data correlated higher base iron nitrogen levels with increased leakage rates. To address this, a ferrotitanium (FeTi) inoculation practice was implemented. Upon dissolution, titanium reacts preferentially with nitrogen to form stable titanium nitride (TiN) inclusions:
$$ Ti + N \rightarrow TiN_{(s)} $$
This reaction effectively “ties up” a portion of the dissolved nitrogen, reducing the amount of free nitrogen available to form deleterious gas pores during the critical solidification phase, thereby enhancing the integrity of the gray cast iron matrix.
As a secondary, robust physical barrier, a cylindrical chill sleeve was designed and placed within the water jacket core at the location of the future ø6 mm oil gallery. This sleeve acts as a high-speed heat sink, promoting rapid directional solidification at that critical interface. Even if minor micro-porosity forms in the underlying metal, the fused chill sleeve presents a dense, continuous metallic barrier, preventing fluid penetration. The combination of metallurgical control (FeTi addition) and thermal management (chill sleeve) reduced leakage at the ø6 mm gallery by 43%.

Leakage at the ø20 mm Oil Gallery: Hot Spot Management
The vertical oil gallery and main oil gallery are cast as solid, heavy sections in the gray cast iron block. The ø20 mm hole is machined into this massive thermal mass. This region is a pronounced hot spot where slow solidification leads to coarse microstructure and susceptibility to shrinkage and gas porosity. Leakage here was also confirmed via SEM to originate from nitrogen porosity networks.
The primary countermeasure remained the FeTi treatment to lower effective nitrogen activity. However, analysis of defect locations showed that the original chill design for this vertical gallery did not provide complete coverage over the potential defect zone. To rectify this, the chill sleeve was redesigned with an optimized, conformal geometry that better followed the contour of the water jacket core. This maximized the chilled surface area and extended the protective “shield” further into the risky region. The governing principle for chill design involves ensuring it extracts heat rapidly enough to modify the local solidification time. The heat extraction can be approximated by considering the thermal diffusivity ($\alpha$) of the gray cast iron and the chill:
$$ \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = \alpha \left( \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2} \right) $$
Where $T$ is temperature and $t$ is time. A well-designed chill increases the thermal gradient ($\nabla T$), accelerating solidification at the critical interface. This optimization, combined with FeTi treatment, yielded a 74% reduction in ø20 mm gallery leakage, with post-validation sectioning confirming excellent fusion between the new chill sleeve and the gray cast iron base material.
Leakage at the Tappet Bore: A Fusion Challenge
Analysis identified two distinct failure modes leading to tappet bore leakage in the gray cast iron casting: poor fusion of the tappet core support (a metal chill/brace), and poor fusion of the ø6 mm gallery chill sleeve on its outer diameter facing the tappet chamber.
1. Poor Fusion of Tappet Core Support: The supports, tin-plated low-carbon steel “I-beam” style chills, act as intense local heat sinks. At lower pouring temperatures, the rapid heat extraction can cause premature solidification of the iron around the chill, preventing proper metallurgical bonding or “burn-in.” This creates a micro-gap. Furthermore, the decomposition of the tin plating can release oxygen, potentially leading to oxide formation at the interface, further inhibiting fusion. The relationship between pouring temperature ($T_{pour}$) and fusion quality was systematically tested. The probability of good fusion $P_{fusion}$ increases sharply above a critical temperature threshold $T_{crit}$ but must be balanced against other defects like core deformation from complete melt-in.
Our experimental matrix, summarized in Table 2, defined the optimal processing window. A clear correlation was established where pour temperatures below ~1410°C resulted in frequent non-fusion, while temperatures above ~1423°C caused excessive chill melting.
| Pouring Temperature Range (°C) | Number of Castings | Castings with Poor Chill Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| 1396 – 1399 | 6 | 6 |
| 1400 – 1403 | 6 | 5 |
| 1404 – 1407 | 6 | 4 |
| 1408 – 1411 | 6 | 3 |
| 1412 – 1415 | 6 | 1 |
| 1416 – 1419 | 6 | 0 |
| 1420 – 1423 | 6 | 0 |
| 1424 – 1427 | 6 | 0 (but core washout) |
Additionally, the core support geometry was optimized. The overall dimensions were reduced (e.g., end diameter from 15.88 mm to 12.7 mm, stem diameter from 3.05 mm to 2.26 mm) to diminish its chilling power. The pattern of vent holes on its face was also revised to be closer to the central stem, theoretically improving gas venting from the critical fusion zone.
2. Poor Fusion of the ø6 mm Gallery Chill Sleeve: This thin-walled sleeve (originally 1.5 mm thick) could also suffer from incomplete fusion with the surrounding gray cast iron, creating a leak path from the water jacket to the tappet bore. Following the same principle applied to the core supports, the sleeve thickness was reduced to 1.2 mm. This reduction in thermal mass lessens its severe chilling effect, allowing the surrounding iron to remain liquid slightly longer, promoting better wetting and metallurgical bonding.
The synergistic implementation of the optimized pouring temperature window, redesigned core supports, and thinner chill sleeves resulted in a 44% reduction in leakage originating from the tappet bore area.
Summary of Improvements and Quantitative Impact
The countermeasures deployed were multifaceted, addressing both the metallurgical state of the gray cast iron and the thermal dynamics of the casting process. Table 3 consolidates the key actions and their effectiveness.
| Leakage Location | Root Cause | Primary Countermeasures | Leakage Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| ø6 mm Oil Gallery | Nitrogen Porosity | FeTi Treatment + Chill Sleeve Implementation | 43% |
| ø20 mm Oil Gallery | Nitrogen Porosity in Hot Spot | FeTi Treatment + Chill Sleeve Geometry Optimization | 74% |
| Tappet Bore | Poor Chill/Core Support Fusion | Optimized Pouring Temp (1410-1423°C) + Support/Sleeve Geometry Redesign | 44% |
The cumulative effect of these targeted improvements was a substantial reduction in the overall scrap rate due to water leakage. The initial leakage rate of 3.3% was successfully lowered to 1.95%, representing a total reduction of 40.9%. This achievement signifies that the quality of the high-strength gray cast iron block has been brought under significantly more stable and controllable parameters.
Conclusion and Foundry Principles
The systematic resolution of the water leakage problem in the A-engine block provides several key learnings relevant to the production of high-integrity gray cast iron components:
- Metallurgical Control is Foundational: The application of ferrotitanium to manage nitrogen activity is a critical measure for mitigating nitrogen-induced porosity in gray cast iron, a defect that is often subsurface and detrimental to pressure tightness.
- Thermal Management is Critical: The strategic use of chills (sleeves and supports) is highly effective for managing solidification in hot spots and providing a physical barrier against defect propagation. However, their design, thickness, and geometry require precise optimization to ensure they fulfill their function without introducing fusion-related defects.
- Process Parameter Windows are Key: Pouring temperature exerts a profound influence on the metallurgical fusion of internal chills and core supports within gray cast iron. Establishing and strictly controlling a scientifically determined optimal temperature range is essential for achieving reliable bonding.
- A Systems Approach is Necessary: No single change was sufficient. The solution required an integrated approach combining chemistry adjustment (FeTi), thermal process control (pour temperature), and design-for-manufacture changes (chill geometry). This holistic view is paramount for solving complex quality issues in advanced gray cast iron castings.
This project underscores that achieving high quality in complex gray cast iron engine blocks is an exercise in balancing metallurgy, thermal physics, and mechanical design. By applying rigorous root-cause analysis and implementing targeted, data-driven countermeasures, significant quality and cost benefits can be realized, ensuring the reliability and performance of the final power unit.
