Process Design and Defect Prevention of a Evaporative Pattern Casting for Ductile Iron Casting

1. Process Design

1.1 Structure Analysis

InformationDetails
Casting MaterialQT400 – 15
Casting Size430 mm × 620 mm × 684 mm
Casting Weight180 kg
Thick Parts183 mm × 40 mm × 59 mm (Easy to produce shrinkage area)
Oil ChannelTotal length 510 mm, high requirements for airtight leak detection

1.2 Process Schemes and Simulation Results

Pouring System SchemeSimulation Results (Shrinkage Porosity Risk Areas)
Side – Bottom InjectionParallel plate and upper end face intersection area, “U” – shaped boss inside, bottom and boss dense area
Top InjectionSimilar to side – bottom injection
Step InjectionInside of “U” – shaped bosses on both sides of casting, parallel plate and upper end face intersection area
Bottom InjectionUpper end face hot spot area and inside of riser

1.3 Process Experiment

Experiment ContentDetails
Selected Pouring SystemBottom injection with riser

2. Defect Analysis

2.1 Main Defects

Defect TypeLocation
Shrinkage HoleUpper end face of casting, at the intersection of parallel plate structure and upper end face

2.2 Cause Analysis

2.2.1 Shrinkage Hole Formation Analysis

  • Solidification Characteristics: Ductile iron casting solidifies in a pasty manner. During solidification, the thick area solidifies slower than the surrounding thin area. After the surrounding area solidifies, the thick area cannot be supplemented with liquid iron, resulting in shrinkage porosity or shrinkage hole defects.
  • Effect of Eutectic Expansion: The eutectic expansion pressure causes the liquid iron volume to increase and may lead to the formation of shrinkage porosity or shrinkage hole. It also affects the mold wall, causing phenomena such as mold wall migration and box expansion.

2.2.2 Risers

  • Function: The riser is mainly used to supplement liquid iron and control pressure.
  • Pressure Change Stages: (Shown in Figure 8) After the gate solidifies, the casting and riser form a whole. When the liquid metal contracts, the pressure in the riser is the smallest. With the precipitation of graphite and the formation of austenite, the liquid metal expands and refills the riser.

3. Improvement Schemes

3.1 Improvement of Riser Parameters

Riser NumberRiser Modulus (MR)Riser Neck Modulus (MN)
1#MS0.8MR
2#1.5MS0.6MR

3.2 Improvement Effects

Pouring SystemDefect Situation
Bottom Injection with 1# RiserShrinkage hole defects in the hot spot area after rough turning, with a rejection rate of 37%
Bottom Injection with 2# RiserNo obvious defects on the upper end face after rough turning, no shrinkage porosity in the hot spot area, but with discrete small point defects on the end face. After full – process processing, the end face defects are removed

4. Conclusions

  • The optimal pouring process for ductile iron castings in evaporative pattern casting is bottom injection with a properly sized riser. Through comparative experiments based on the product structure, the best solution to solve shrinkage porosity defects is obtained.
  • After determining the pouring system, strengthening the control of the whole process, including preventing collisions, controlling coating drying, pouring negative pressure, and pressure maintaining, is beneficial to improving the internal and external quality of the casting.
Scroll to Top