Analysis of Casting Process for Drill Base Casting Parts

In the manufacturing industry, casting parts play a crucial role in producing complex components with high precision and structural integrity. As a casting engineer, I have extensively studied the casting process for a drill base, which is a key component in multi-spindle drilling machines. This casting part demands exceptional quality in terms of internal soundness, surface hardness, rigidity, flatness, and appearance. In this article, I will delve into the detailed analysis of the casting process for such casting parts, focusing on overcoming common defects like cold shuts, sand drops, and shrinkage. The goal is to share insights that can enhance the yield and quality of similar casting parts in industrial applications.

The drill base casting part, as shown in the reference, is a large-scale component weighing approximately 500 kg with overall dimensions of 1800 mm × 606 mm × 100 mm. Its design includes a top working surface that requires high flatness and wear resistance, supported by an intricate network of ribs to prevent deformation during machining. The surrounding oil groove, with precise radii, poses significant challenges in molding and casting. Through iterative trials and process refinements, I have developed a robust methodology that ensures reliable production of these casting parts. Below, I will systematically explore the structural characteristics, process design, and optimization steps, incorporating tables and formulas to summarize key aspects.

To begin, let’s analyze the structural features of this casting part. The drill base has a variable wall thickness ranging from 12 mm to 42 mm, with the top surface being the primary working area. The internal rib structure is dense to enhance rigidity, but this leads to potential issues like hot tearing and sand drop defects. The oil groove around the perimeter has a complex profile with smooth transitions, requiring precise molding to avoid shape errors. In table 1, I summarize the key technical requirements and dimensions for this casting part.

Table 1: Technical Specifications of the Drill Base Casting Part
Parameter Value Remarks
Weight 500 kg Approximate
Overall Dimensions 1800 mm × 606 mm × 100 mm Length × Width × Height
Minimum Wall Thickness 12 mm In rib areas
Maximum Wall Thickness 42 mm At central boss
Top Surface Area 1700 mm × 508 mm High flatness required
Oil Groove Radii R16 mm and R8 mm Smooth transition

The rib connections are critical in casting parts to prevent thermal cracking. In this drill base, multiple ribs intersect, and I evaluated two connection schemes. The first involves direct交叉 with sharp corners, leading to a large hot spot diameter. The second uses a circular ring design where ribs connect in a T-shape, reducing the hot spot diameter significantly. The hot spot diameter ($d$) can be calculated based on the rib thickness and geometry. For a rib with thickness $t$, the hot spot diameter at intersections can be approximated using empirical formulas. For instance, for three ribs intersecting, the hot spot diameter $d_1$ is given by:

$$ d_1 = \sqrt{(2t)^2 + (2t)^2} = 2t\sqrt{2} $$

With $t = 16$ mm, this yields $d_1 \approx 45.3$ mm, which aligns with the observed 48 mm in practice. In contrast, the T-shape connection with a ring reduces this to $d_2 \approx 23$ mm, as shown in the formula:

$$ d_2 = t + 2r $$

where $r$ is the fillet radius (8 mm). This reduction minimizes thermal gradients and prevents hot tearing, a common issue in casting parts with dense ribs. Thus, for such casting parts, I recommend the ring-based connection design to enhance structural integrity.

Moving to the casting process design, I adopted a green sand molding approach with dry sand molds and cores, using a two-flask whole pattern method. The top working surface is placed downward in the mold to ensure better quality for critical areas. The molding of the oil groove is challenging, and I compared two methods: direct molding with a solid pattern and a core assembly method. The core assembly method proved superior for these casting parts, as it allows for more accurate shape formation and reduces修型 work. In this method, the oil groove is formed by a set of cores, including corner cores, gate cores, and straight cores, assembled in the wet state and then dried uniformly. This approach improves the appearance and dimensional accuracy of casting parts.

The gating system is pivotal for defect-free casting parts. I evaluated top-gating and bottom-gating systems. Top-gating from the side of the parting plane often causes cold shuts in the oil groove edges due to premature solidification of少量 metal. Bottom-gating, where metal enters from the bottom of the mold cavity, ensures平稳 filling from below upward, avoiding cold shuts. The gating ratio is designed to ensure proper flow. For this casting part, I used the ratio:

$$ \sum F_{\text{inner}} : \sum F_{\text{runner}} : \sum F_{\text{sprue}} = 1 : 1.4 : 1.15 $$

where $\sum F_{\text{inner}} = 4 \times 3.96 \, \text{cm}^2$, $\sum F_{\text{runner}} = 2 \times 11.8 \, \text{cm}^2$, and $\sum F_{\text{sprue}} = 18 \, \text{cm}^2$ (φ48 mm). This design promotes smooth metal flow, essential for high-quality casting parts. Additionally, risers are placed at locations with higher thickness, such as the central boss and mounting bases, to compensate for shrinkage. The riser size is determined based on the modulus method. For a cylindrical riser, the volume $V_r$ should satisfy:

$$ V_r \geq \frac{V_c \cdot \alpha}{1 – \alpha} $$

where $V_c$ is the volume of the casting part section and $\alpha$ is the shrinkage allowance (typically 4-6% for cast iron). For this casting part, I used risers of φ70 mm × 200 mm to ensure adequate feeding.

Table 2: Gating and Riser Parameters for the Drill Base Casting Part
Component Dimensions/Values Function
Inner Gates 4 × 3.96 cm² Control metal entry
Runner 2 × 11.8 cm² Distribute metal flow
Sprue 18 cm² (φ48 mm) Vertical channel
Risers φ70 mm × 200 mm (4 nos.) Compensate shrinkage
Gating Ratio 1 : 1.4 : 1.15 Optimize flow characteristics

Process parameters are set to ensure dimensional accuracy. The machining allowance for the bottom surface is 6 mm, while for the top protrusions, it is 8 mm due to potential slag defects. The shrinkage allowance is taken as 1%, common for cast iron casting parts. The pattern allowance considers these factors to achieve net-shape casting parts after machining.

In molding operations, preventing sand drop in the rib areas is critical. The rib pattern is designed with fixed connections for main ribs and loose pieces for斜 ribs, allowing easy withdrawal without damaging the sand. During molding, I follow a sequence: prepare the drag flask, loosen the pattern, place the cope flask, and then invert the entire assembly before lifting the pattern. This minimizes砂块 damage. Additionally, nails are inserted into the sand projections to reinforce them, a practical tip for producing robust casting parts.

The melting and pouring practices directly impact the quality of casting parts. The chemical composition of the cast iron is controlled to achieve desired properties. As summarized in table 3, the composition includes carbon, silicon, manganese, sulfur, and phosphorus within specific ranges. The pouring temperature is vital to avoid defects like cold shuts or shrinkage.

Table 3: Chemical Composition and Pouring Parameters for Cast Iron Casting Parts
Element/Parameter Target Value Control Method
Carbon (C) 3.3% Charge calculation
Silicon (Si) 1.85% Inoculation if needed
Manganese (Mn) 0.8% Alloy addition
Sulfur (S) 0.05% Limit to avoid brittleness
Phosphorus (P) 0.1% Control for fluidity
Chill Test (White Iron) 4-5 mm Adjust with 75SiFe
Pouring Temperature 1360-1390°C Thermocouple measurement
Tap Temperature 1430°C Ensure superheat

The chill test is used for front control; if the white iron depth exceeds 5 mm, inoculation with ferrosilicon is done to improve graphitization. The pouring temperature range of 1360-1390°C is maintained to ensure proper fluidity while minimizing gas absorption. During pouring, slag is skimmed, and air is vented to produce sound casting parts.

Through trial productions, I refined the process. Initially, 5 casting parts were produced, and one exhibited cold shuts in the oil groove edge. Analysis revealed that metal leakage through the parting plane near the sprue caused premature solidification. To fix this, I used asbestos rope to seal the parting plane around the sprue, ensuring metal entry only from the bottom. This adjustment eliminated cold shuts in subsequent batches. Over 120 casting parts were produced with a reject rate below 3%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the process for such casting parts.

The core assembly method for the oil groove not only improved accuracy but also reduced修型 time. The gating system design proved crucial for defect prevention. In summary, for large casting parts with stringent appearance requirements, core-based molding and bottom-gating are recommended. The rib design with ring connections enhances thermal uniformity, and proper risering avoids shrinkage. These insights can be applied to other casting parts in heavy machinery.

To further generalize, the quality of casting parts depends on multiple factors, which can be modeled using statistical methods. For example, the yield strength $\sigma_y$ of a casting part can be related to the cooling rate $R$ through empirical equations like:

$$ \sigma_y = A + B \cdot \ln(R) $$

where $A$ and $B$ are material constants. Similarly, the defect probability $P_d$ can be reduced by optimizing process parameters such as pouring temperature $T_p$ and mold hardness $H_m$:

$$ P_d = k_1 \cdot e^{-k_2 T_p} + k_3 \cdot H_m^{-1} $$

These formulas highlight the importance of controlled parameters in manufacturing reliable casting parts.

In conclusion, the casting process for drill base casting parts involves meticulous design and execution. By focusing on structural analysis, process optimization, and continuous improvement, high-quality casting parts can be consistently produced. The use of core assembly, bottom-gating, and proper rib connections are key takeaways for similar applications. As casting technology evolves, these principles will continue to guide the production of durable and precise casting parts for various industries.

Scroll to Top